Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 20;18(3):928. doi: 10.3390/s18030928

Table 4.

Comparison of the responses of P3HT-based receptor structures to NO2.

Material NO2 Concentration Response Operating Temperature Reference
PEGSil H 1 ppm 1330%
605%
1980%
RT
50 °C
100 °C
Current work
rrP3HT 5 ppm 188% 50 °C [18]
P3HT 5 ppm 11% * RT [33]
Poly(methylsiloxane)-graft-poly(3-hexylthiophe)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) 5 ppm 2300% 50 °C [18]
(P3HT) ZnO@GO hybrid 5 ppm 210% 50 °C [37]
P3HT/ZnO NS-NR composite 4 ppm 60% * RT [38]
RGO-P3HT composite 4 ppm 40% * RT [39]
P3HT:ZnO (ratio6:2) hybrid 5 ppm 20% * RT [40]
P3HT-SnO2composite 5 ppm 500% 100 °C [41]
Poly-(bisdodecylquaterthiophene) 5 ppm 300% * RT [26]
poly-(bisdodecylthioquaterthiophene) 5 ppm 450% * RT [26]
P3HT:ZnO-nanowire composite 4 ppm 30% * RT [42]

* Response calculated as (Ra − Rg)/Ra or (Ia − Ig)/Ia.