Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2012 Dec 20;16(2):198–208. doi: 10.1111/desc.12016

Table 2.

Means (SDs) for the context-sensitivity and Executive Function tasks

Task Age Group
All
4–5
6–7
8–9
US Japan US Japan US Japan US Japan
Aggregated Context-Sensitivity Z-Score
−.17
(.61)
.17***(d=.50)
(.78)
−.51
(.68)
−.42(d=.12)
(.83)
−.18
(.52)
.27**(d=.86)
(.53)
.18
(.39)
.72***(d=1.28)
(.45)
.00
(.72)
−.47a
(.75)
.04b
(.56)
.44c
(.50)
Free Description
 First mentioned objects (background – focal) −7.90
(4.64)
−4.50***(d=.64)
(5.91)
−8.57
(4.61)
−6.79(d=.38)
(4.62)
−7.37
(5.07)
−3.96*(d=.62)
(5.81)
−7.73
(4.23)
−2.64**(d=.92)
(6.58)
−6.22
(5.56)
−7.69a
(4.67)
−5.75b
(5.65)
−5.09b
(6.09)
 Descriptive accounts (background – focal) 4.14
(12.10)
20.06***(d=.70)
(30.04)
−.27
(10.02)
5.59*(d=.53)
(12.03)
4.07
(12.38)
14.30*(d=.55)
(23.42)
9.31
(12.33)
40.61***(d= 1.12)
(37.42)
12.01
(24.10)
2.61a
(11.35)
8.91b
(18.99)
25.54c
(32.16)
 Relational accounts (background – focal) 4.35
(6.38)
5.81(d=.19)
(8.61)
1.37
(4.77)
2.03(d=.14)
(5.10)
4.50
(7.51)
5.67(d=.15)
(8.50)
7.62
(4.98)
9.86(d=.28)
(9.97)
5.07
(7.58)
1.69a
(4.90)
5.05b
(7.94)
8.78c
(7.97)
Ebbinghaus Illusion
 Percentage of correct answers (no context – illusional context) 68.26
(47.02)
78.49*(d=.27)
(34.76)
52.50
(47.50)
55.00(d=.05)
(46.61)
67.50
(39.47)
85.71*(d=.59)
(18.54)
85.34
(22.68)
96.43*(d=.62)
(11.21)
73.29
(37.77)
53.75a
(46.67)
76.29b
(32.25)
90.79c
(18.68)
DCCS
 Accuracy (number of correct answers) 41.31
(7.54)
43.13(d=.28)
(5.32)
38.68
(7.66)
39.42(d=.10)
(7.81)
39.74
(8.73)
44.32*(d=.71)
(2.63)
45.65
(2.77)
45.25(d=.17)
(1.86)
42.25
(6.53)
39.07a
(7.66)
41.94a
(6.89)
45.43b
(2.30)
 Response time (in msec) 1295.12
(436.77)
1147.79*(d=.35)
(399.53)
1630.46
(407.83)
1432.44(d=.45)
(463.19)
1205.11
(441.44)
1156.36(d=.13)
(304.17)
1080.03
(236.28)
896.15**(d=.81)
(215.76)
1218.99
(423.02)
1527.15a
(444.16)
1181.67b
(378.80)
979.08c
(241.34)
 Average z-score (accuracy and reversed RT) −.16
(.85)
.15*(d=.41)
(.69)
−.76
(.70)
−.47(d=.38)
(.82)
−.18
(.95)
.23*(d=.56)
(.38)
.42
(.28)
.61*(d=.69)
(.26)
−.61
(.77)
.02a
(.76)
.53b
(.28)
.00c
(.78)
Gift Delay
 Number of transgressions 1.26***(d=.56)
(1.92)
2.56
(2.67)
1.27***(d=1.17)
(1.68)
4.19
(3.10)
1.57(d=.39)
(1.87)
2.38
(2.25)
.97(d=.07)
(2.20)
1.11
(1.48)
1.89
(2.39)
2.65a
(2.84)
1.96a
(2.08)
1.04b
(1.87)
 Latency for the first transgression (in sec) 107.92***(d=.51)
(78.34)
68.25
(76.89)
104.27***(d=.93)
(79.23)
39.13
(58.93)
87.21(d=.27)
(80.54)
65.78
(75.95)
132.41(d=.40)
(70.72)
101.82
(83.61)
88.43
(79.92)
71.70a
(76.62)
76.88a
(78.40)
117.39b
(78.16)

Note. Significant cultural differences within each age group are indicated by

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01, and

***

p < .001. Effect sizes of cultural differences are indicated by Cohen’s d s. Significant age-group differences are indicated by superscript letters (a, b, c).