Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;118(6):825–830. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.467

Table 3. The incremental prognostic information of each marker was assessed by performing separate multivariable Cox regression analyses including each marker and the IGCCCG risk groupings.

  Overall survival
  HR (95% CI) P-value
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 0.142 (0.032–0.623) 0.010
Haemoglobin (g l−1) 0.983 (0.958–1.007) 0.17
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 7.26 (2.03–26.0) 0.002
Leukocytes (103 per μl) 1.27 (1.06–1.54) 0.011
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 0.180 (0.047–0.686) 0.012
Neutrophils (103 per μl) 1.47 (1.09–1.98) 0.011
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 0.117 (0.017–0.810) 0.030
CRP (mg l−1) 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 0.062
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 0.131–0.008–2.12) 0.15
Albumin (g l−1) 0.981 (0.768–1.25) 0.88
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 0.130 (0.036–0.464) 0.002
NLRa 84.5 (2.2–3193) 0.017
IGCCCG risk groups (good/intermediate vs poor risk) 0.161 (0.042–0.615) 0.008
SIIa 12.1 (1.17–126) 0.037

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRP=C-reactive protein; HR=hazard ratio; IGCCCG=International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group; NLR=neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio; SII=systemic immune-inflammation index.

a

After log10 transformation: the HR thus corresponds to a 10-fold increase of the variable, bold P-values indicate statistical significance.