. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Pers Individ Dif. 2017 Nov 23;123:217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.023

Table 3.

Effect Estimates (SE) of Neuroticism, Daily Rumination, and Daily Negative Affect on Sleep Quality and Difficulty Falling Asleep

	Sleep quality	Difficulty falling asleep	VIF
Intercept	71.87 (5.26)^***	18.20 (5.38)^***	–
Neuroticism	−0.07 (0.09)	0.06 (0.09)	1.29
Average rumination	−0.001 (0.09)	0.06 (0.09)	2.60
Average negative affect	−0.43 (0.10)^***	0.41 (0.11)^***	2.35
Daily rumination	−0.03 (0.04)	0.06 (0.05)	1.38
Daily negative affect	−0.10 (0.04)^**	0.11 (0.05)^*	1.38
Level 1 residual variance	371.10 (12.23)^***	602.34 (20.07)^***	–
Level 2 variance in intercept	270.05 (30.18)^***	258.29 (31.26)^***	–
Level 2 variance in rumination slope	0.05 (0.02)^**	0.07 (0.04)^*	–
Level 2 variance in negative affect slope	0.01 (0.02)	0.06 (0.04)	–
Level 1 pseudo R²	0.05	0.02	–
Level 2 pseudo R²	0.24	0.25	–

Notes.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.

N_persons = 242, N_person-days = 2977. All analyses control for age, gender, income, weekday vs. weekend (not displayed). VIF = variance inflation factors from SAS PROC REG (VIFs were the same values for both sleep outcomes; therefore only one VIF is displayed per predictor.)