Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Ecol. 2018 Jan 15;55:820–829. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13070

Table 2.

Candidate models used to evaluate hypotheses describing presence-absence or abundance of Pseudogymnoascus destructans within hibernacula (sites).

Model Covariate Description
Environment
Spatial X Distance from the entrance
Z Height from the floor
Type Sediment or wall-swab
Temporal WNStime Time since first confirmation of WNS in bats at the site. Each unit coincides with a sampling interval (approximately every four months).
Time of year Time of year sample was collected; early hibernation, late hibernation, summer
Climate Tdmean Daily mean temperature
Tdrange Daily temperature range
Bats
Spatial Regiona Sampling region within the site (near entrance, middle, deep)
Zb Height from the floor
Temporal WNSWintersc Winters since first confirmation of WNS in bats at a site
Climate Tdmean Daily mean temperature within 2 m of roost location
Tdrange Daily temperature range within 2 m of roost location
Host Species Myotis lucifugus, Perimyotis subflavus, or Myotis sodalis
Sex male, female
BMI Body mass index [mass (g) / forearm (mm)]
Clinical signs Fungus Extent of visible fungus on the wing
UV Extent of UV fluorescence on the wing
a

Included in models using full dataset.

b

Included in models using subset dataset with paired temperature information because we included temperature at roost location as a covariate. X was not included due to collinearity with other covariates in models.

c

Omitted in models using subset dataset due to a singularity in response by site, which was included as a random effect.