Table 3.

Cox multivariate analyses for the GA (A) and HiSeq (B) datasets. miR-155 levels were used together with age and gender (Model 1) and age, gender, tumour stage and histological grade (Model 2).

A	GA
	Model 1		Model 2
	HR (95% CI)	p	HR	p
Per SD	1.18 (1.04, 1.35)	0.013	1.0 (0.82, 1.21)	0.97
Vs Q1
Q2	1.88 (0.92, 3.83)	0.082	1.39 (0.7, 2.77)	0.342
Q3	2.19 (1.12, 4.28)	0.022	1.22 (0.62, 2.39)	0.567
Q4	3.03 (1.57, 5.85)	0.001	1.46 (0.76, 2.8)	0.261
Model 1	age, sex
model 2	+stage, grade
B	HiSEQ
	Model 1		Model 2
	HR (95% CI)	p	HR	p
Per SD	1.27 (1.00, 1.62)	0.046	1.1 (0.85–1.43)	0.449
Vs Q1
Q2	0.98 (0.42, 2.27)	0.955	1.0 (0.42, 2.39)	0.996
Q3	1.84 (0.84, 4.01)	0.128	2.4 (1.07, 5.37)	0.033
Q4	1.67 (0.79, 3.53)	0.181	1.07 (0.5, 2.3)	0.862
Model 1	age, sex
model 2	+stage, grade

SD: standard deviation, Q1: quartile 1, HR: hazard ration, CI: confidence interval,