Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;17(2):182–197. doi: 10.1002/pst.1845

Table 3.

GLM estimated through MLE with and without Firth correction for T=100, J=5, b=20 in a case of scenario 1 with D=0.24

(I) GLM fitting without correction for CR
β0^
Eβi^
EMSE
Epvalue<0.05
β0^
−0.8684 0.1992 0.5174
βt^
0.2610 0.0243 0.4018
β1^
0.0070 0.1900 0.0544
(II) GLM fitting with correction for CR
β0^
−0.8370 0.1838 0.5224
βt^
0.2509 0.0227 0.4012
β1^
0.0067 0.1775 0.0534
(III) GLM fitting without correction for FLGI
β0^
−1.4465 8.9957 0.4110
βt^
0.1898 0.0307 0.1844
β1^
0.0038 18.2440 0.0142
(IV) GLM fitting with correction for FLGI
β0^
−0.9307 0.3947 0.4670
βt^
0.1825 0.0301 0.1858
β1^
0.0048 0.7993 0.0456

Abbreviations: CR, complete randomisation; FLGI, forward‐looking Gittins index rule; GLM, generalised linear model; MLE, maximum likelihood estimation; MSE, mean squared error. Results for 5000 trials. True values were assumed to be β 0≈−0.8473, β t≈0.2719 and β z=β 1=0.