Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;17(2):182–197. doi: 10.1002/pst.1845

Table 6.

GLM estimated through MLE with Firth correction for T=200, J=10, b=20, K=3 in a case of scenario 2 in which q j=[0.5:0.05:0.95]

(II) GLM fitting with correction for CR
β0^
Eβi^
EMSE
Epvalue<0.05
β0^
−0.8816 0.1324 0.7078
βz^
1.3006 0.1239 0.9726
β1^
0.9355 0.1549 0.6954
β2^
−0.0032 0.1356 0.0516
(IV) GLM fitting with correction for FLGI
β0^
−1.1635 0.5391 0.3994
βz^
1.3492 0.1300 0.9762
β1^
1.1300 0.5845 0.3672
β2^
0.0041 0.7740 0.0246
(VI) GLM fitting with correction for CFLGI
β0^
−0.8861 0.1378 0.6966
βz^
1.3127 0.1243 0.9718
β1^
0.8862 0.2077 0.7718
β2^
−0.2487 0.5027 0.0288

Abbreviations: CR, complete randomisation; CFLGI, controlled forward‐looking Gittins index rule; FLGI, forward‐looking Gittins index rule; GLM, generalised linear model; MLE, maximum likelihood estimation; MSE, mean squared error. Results for 5000 trials. True values were assumed to be β 0≈−0.8473, β z≈1.2528 and β 1=0.8473, β t=β 2=0.