Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Jun 2;44(6):603–611. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12726

Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons (N=6) of four groups of adjuvant periodontal treatments (largest difference in bold) included in the Guideline Project and summary estimates for the treatments + SRP versus SRP alone

1. Systemic host modulator 2. Systemic antimicrobials 3. Topical antimicrobials 4. Lasers

CAL difference between treatments in mm (95% confidence interval)

2. Systemic antimicrobials 0.06 (−0.28, 0.40)
3. Topical antimicrobials −0.04 (−0.39, 0.32) −0.10 (−0.35, 0.15)
4. Lasers 0.14 (−0.28, 0.56) 0.08 (−0.26, 0.42) 0.18 (−0.17, 0.52)

Summary estimate for treatment vs. SRP based on network meta-analysis* 0.42 (0.12, 0.72) 0.36 (0.19, 0.52) 0.45 (0.27, 0.64) 0.28 (−0.02, 0.57)
*

Guideline meta-analysis did not provide an estimate for these groupings