Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 1;5:17. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0021-6

Table 3.

SSR, SNP, distorted markers, and bin markers mapped to each LG for the three diploid rose population as well as the integrated consensus map

Population
LG Marker statistics J14-3×LC J14-3×VS OB×RF ICD
LG1 SSR no. 3 2 4 4
SNP no. 186 159 99 344
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 0 60 48
Bin marker no. 38 39 48 93
Total 189 161 103 348
LG2 SSR no. 1 1 2 2
SNP no. 270 296 367 751
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 81 7 53
Bin marker no. 60 81 76 161
Total 271 297 369 753
LG3 SSR no. 2 2 4 4
SNP no. 194 121 80 336
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 22 27 14
Bin marker no. 49 43 31 91
Total 196 123 84 340
LG4 SSR no. 1 1 1 1
SNP no. 198 223 220 519
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 32 4 0
Bin marker no. 40 49 61 120
Total 199 224 221 520
LG5 SSR no. 2 2 1 2
SNP no. 273 224 302 562
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 29 60 0
Bin marker no. 50 56 64 121
Total 275 226 303 564
LG6 SSR no. 1 1 1 1
SNP no. 219 139 224 471
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 52 10 87
Bin marker no. 45 39 61 109
Total 220 140 225 472
LG7 SSR no. 4 4 5 6
SNP no. 227 259 241 524
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 0 32 24
Bin marker no. 54 62 45 125
Total 231 263 246 530
Overall SSR no. 14 13 18 20
SNP no. 1567 1421 1533 3507
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 216 200 226
Bin marker no. 336 369 386 820
Total 1581 1434 1551 3527

Marker distortion was based on a χ2 test (p < 0.05); LGs having more than 50 highly distorted markers are shown in bold for each population; “—” indicates distortion is not available for the consensus map.