Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Apr 1;21(2):189–196. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.189-196

TABLE 1.

QUALITATIVE STUDIES ABOUT CONTRACEPTION COUNSELING, CONTRACEPTION USE, UNINTENDED PREGNANCY, AND ABORTION AMONG WOMEN WITH CANCER

Study Design Sample Diagnosis Quality and validity
Connell, et al., 2006 Longitudinal; three face-to-face semistructured interviews 60 minutes long and six months apart. 13 women aged 29–40 years with a mean age of 37 years; purposeful sample; Australia Breast cancer diagnosed within the past four years Reflexivity via field notes; multiple coders; 83–90% inter-rater reliability with spot checks; confirmed interpretation with participants

Karaöz, et al., 2010 Single face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. 25–35 minutes long 20 women; average age of 40.2 years (SD = 5.2 years); convenience sampling; Aydin, Turkey Breast cancer diagnosed within the past year Interview guide pilot tested

Thewes et al., 2003 Four face-to-face focus groups of four women each (N=16) for 90 minutes; semistructured interviews by phone and written questionnaire with one question (N=8) 24 women aged 26–45 years at time of diagnosis with a mean age of 34 years; convenience sample; Sydney, Australia Breast cancer diagnosed within the past five years Reflexivity via field notes; 66% participation rate; confirmed interpretation with participants

Zebrack et al., 2004 Telephone semistructured interviews 90 minutes long 14 women aged 19–37 years with a mean age of 24.2 years; convenience sample; recruited from the Children’s Cancer Group; California Childhood cancer survivors at least five years from diagnosis Multiple coders; 90% inter-rater reliability