Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;115(13):E2997–E3006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718792115

Table 2.

Results of one-way ANOVA analysis conducted for each ERG stimulus condition

ERG amplitude WT rd10 NT rd10 + LP rd10 + LP-CN03 df F P
n Mean, μV SD, μV n Mean, μV SD, μV n Mean, μV SD, μV n Mean, μV SD, μV
Scotopic single flash 0.0001
 b-wave 8 19.85 12.54 7 16.15 11.36 8 27.45 12.96 (2, 22) 1.65 ns
Scotopic single flash 0.03
 a-wave 8 −3.74 3.38 6 −7.00 4.97 8 −4.93 7.60 (2, 21) 0.57 ns
 b-wave 8 26.07 15.84 7 29.96 20.41 8 69.94 43.92 (2, 22) 5.23 0.0149*
Scotopic single flash 0.3
 a-wave 8 −6.71 8.33 5 −11.44 7.44 8 −6.48 6.09 (2, 20) 0.83 ns
 b-wave 8 16.40 6.57 7 58.48 22.04 8 103.18 48.18 (2, 22) 15.48 <0.0001***
Scotopic single flash 3.0
 a-wave 7 −12.39 7.73 7 −15.77 14.38 8 −14.58 12.47 (2, 21) 0.16 ns
 b-wave 8 36.09 22.94 7 86.26 36.73 8 173.09 71.07 (2, 22) 16.27 <0.0001***
Scotopic single flash 30
 a-wave 8 −11.31 7.71 5 −14.82 10.16 8 −29.85 14.08 (2, 20) 6.10 0.0095**
 b-wave 8 57.36 38.05 7 81.35 55.78 8 220.80 83.16 (2, 22) 15.94 <0.0001***
Photopic single flash 3.0
 a-wave 7 −2.54 3.96 6 −6.39 7.91 8 −5.16 5.27 (2, 20) 0.77 ns
 b-wave 7 26.38 10.32 7 38.34 20.45 8 81.67 29.12 (2, 21) 13.46 0.0002***
Scotopic 5-Hz flicker 4 93.37 11.73 8 6.02 0.94 14 6.45 4.75 8 7.20 2.00 (3, 30) 359.87 <0.0001***
Photopic 10-Hz flicker 4 36.82 10.14 7 11.01 7.28 11 15.68 9.48 8 43.33 12.59 (3, 29) 18.33 <0.0001***

Comparison of LP-CN03 effects on ERG amplitudes at P30 in WT and rd10 mice, not treated (NT), treated with empty liposome (LP), or LP-CN03, respectively. ns: P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.