Table 3.

Post hoc analysis using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test on all possible pairwise contrasts for each stimulus condition

ERG amplitude	Pair		Least significant mean difference		CI, μV	P
			Mean, μV	SD, μV
Scotopic single flash 0.03
b-wave	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 NT	43.87	14.90	[6.18, 81.56]	0.0209*
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 + LP	39.98	15.42	[0.96, 78.99]	0.0440*
	rd10 + LP	rd10 NT	3.89	15.42	[−35.12, 42.91]	ns
Scotopic single flash 0.3
b-wave	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 NT	86.78	15.60	[47.32, 126.24]	<0.0001***
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 + LP	44.70	16.15	[3.86, 85.55]	0.0305*
	rd10 + LP	rd10 NT	42.07	16.15	[1.23, 82.92]	0.0428*
Scotopic single flash 3.0
b-wave	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 NT	137.00	24.27	[75.59, 198.41]	<0.0001***
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 + LP	86.83	25.13	[23.26, 150.39]	0.0067**
	rd10 + LP	rd10 NT	50.17	25.13	[−13.39, 113.74]	ns
Scotopic single flash 30
a-wave	rd10 NT	rd10 + LP-CN03	18.54	5.55	[4.38, 32.70]	0.0097**
	rd10 + LP	rd10 + LP-CN03	15.03	6.33	[−1.11, 31.18]	ns
	rd10 NT	rd10 + LP	3.51	6.33	[−12.64, 19.65]	ns
b-wave	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 NT	163.44	31.07	[84.85, 242.04]	0.0001***
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 + LP	139.45	32.16	[58.10, 220.81]	0.0009**
	rd10 + LP	rd10 NT	23.99	32.16	[−57.36, 105.35]	ns
Scotopic 5-Hz flicker	WT	rd10 NT	87.35	3.04	[79.08, 95.62]	<0.0001***
	WT	rd10 + LP	86.92	2.82	[79.27, 94.58]	<0.0001***
	WT	rd10 + LP-CN03	86.17	3.04	[77.91, 94.44]	<0.0001***
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 NT	1.18	2.48	[−5.57, 7.93]	ns
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 + LP	0.75	2.20	[−5.24, 6.73]	ns
	rd10 + LP	rd10 NT	0.43	2.20	[−5.55, 6.41]	ns
Photopic 10-Hz flicker	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 NT	32.32	5.21	[18.03, 46.61]	<0.0001***
	rd10 + LP-CN03	rd10 + LP	27.65	4.68	[14.82, 40.49]	<0.0001***
	WT	rd10 NT	25.81	6.31	[8.50, 43.12]	0.0020**
	WT	rd10 + LP	21.15	5.88	[5.02, 37.27]	0.0068**
	rd10 + LP-CN03	WT	6.51	6.16	[−10.40, 23.42]	ns
	rd10 + LP	rd10 NT	4.67	4.87	[−8.69, 18.02]	ns

ns: P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001; LP, empty liposome; NT, not treated.