Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;115(13):3279–3284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720415115

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Microscopic dynamics and energy redistribution of the system. (A) Microscopic description of the system dynamics following the detuning quench, in terms of a Landau–Zener transition. One-dimensional lattice potentials are shown for a normal lattice (Top), a dynamic superlattice with site offset δoff generated by superfluid surface atoms (Middle), and a tilted dynamic superlattice with spatially varying site offset δoff+δtrap as encountered at the edge of the harmonic trap (Bottom). Colored circles represent atoms in the states |1,1 (orange) or |2,0 (green). Resonant nearest-neighbor tunneling is allowed when the site offset δoff+δtrap equals the short-range interaction strength U𝗌. (B) Dynamics of the site offset δoff in the metastability measurement. (C, Top) Sketch of the excitation energy of the bulk atoms. Superfluid surface atoms add a symmetry-breaking field to the toy model. During the imbalance jump (ii), the highly excited system reduces the initial excitation energy E1 via an avalanche of inherently nonadiabatic Landau-Zener transitions by an amount of ΔE. Colored circles represent the state of the system, where the MI state (orange) results from all bulk atoms in the |1,1 state and the CDW state (green) from atoms being in a superposition of |1,1 and |2,0 states. Accordingly, the relative imbalance saturates at Θ/N<1, indicated by the dashed line. (C, Bottom) Reduction of ΔE as a function of time τs during the imbalance jump (ii). (B and C) Exemplary traces use the same data as shown in Fig. 4. δoff and ΔE are inferred from the photon flux leaking from the cavity.