Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 2;18:150. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3044-6

Table 6.

Intimate relationship characteristics associated with concurrent UAI in the past six months

Factors Concurrent UAI (had UAI with both regular male sex partners and non-regular male sex partners)
Row% (n/n1) OR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) ORm (95% CI)
Had multiple RP in the past six months
 No 17.5 (48/274) 1 1
 Yes 27.3 (36/132) 1.77 (1.08,2.89)* 1.67 (1.00,2.79)† NS
Expectation for this relationship
 Length of the relationship
   < 6 month 21.2 (45/212) 1 1
   ≥ 6 month 20.1 (39/194) 0.93 (0.58,1.51) 0.95 (0.56,1.59)
 Believed this was a serious relationship
  No 24.7 (45/182) 1 1
  Yes 17.4 (39/224) 0.64 (0.40,1.04)† 0.66 (0.40,1.10)
 Perceived that this relationship would continue for a long time
  No 32.1 (27/84) 1 1
  Yes 17.7 (57/322) 0.45 (0.26,0.78)** 0.49 (0.27,0.87)* 0.49 (0.27,0.88)*
Conflict of interest
 Exchanged money or materials to maintain this sexual relationship
  No 19.8 (79/398) 1 1
  Yes 62.5 (5/8) 6.73 (1.58,28.76)* 5.98 (1.31,27.22)* 5.90 (1.27,27.43)*
The dependence model
 Invested more emotion in this regular relationship
  No 19.2 (51/265) 1 1
  Yes 23.4 (33/141) 1.28 (0.78,2.10) 1.42 (0.85,2.38)
 Your RP is dominant in this relationship
  No 21.6 (67/310) 1 1
  Yes 17.7 (17/96) 0.78 (0.43,1.41) 0.87 (0.47,1.61)
Open communication on sexual relationship
 Openly discussed being monogamous in this relationship
  No 22.3 (55/247) 1 1
  Yes 18.2 (29/159) 0.78 (0.47,1.29) 0.81 (0.48,1.37)
 Openly discussed a sexual agreement or requirement to use condoms when having sex with other partners
  No 24.4 (47/193) 1 1
  Yes 17.4 (37/213) 0.65 (0.40,1.06)† 0.70 (0.42,1.15)

p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

AOR Adjusted odds ratio in multivariate logistic regression, ORm Adjusted odds ratio in multiple forward stepwise regression

AOR and ORm were calculated after adjusting for confounders, and confounders including age (as a continuous variable), marital status (currently married or not), Guangzhou permanent resident (Yes or No), education level (higher than post-secondary education level or not), sexual orientation (bisexual/uncertain, or homosexual), and duration being MSM (less than five years, five years/ longer than five years), recruitment via Internet (Yes or No)

n1: n1 actually is the n in Table 3, to distinguish the n in Tables 4, 5, 6, we use n1 to represent the n of Table 3

NS Variables with p < 0.10 in multivariate logistic regression, but were not significant in multiple forward stepwise logistic regression