Table 5.
Results from Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis for Vitamin A
Risk Factor | Subcategory | Unadjusted OR | 95% CI | p-valuec | Adjusted ORa | 95% CI | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Group | < 1 | 1 | Test-for trend: 0.299 | 1 | 0.305 | ||
1–2 | 0.99 | 0.63–1.58 | 1.13 | 0.53–2.42 | |||
2–3 | 1.10 | 0.69–1.76 | 1.65 | 0.94–2.89 | |||
3–4 | 0.94 | 0.58–1.53 | 0.99 | 0.52–1.90 | |||
4+ | 1.38 | 0.82–2.31 | 1.18 | 0.61–2.25 | |||
Gender | Male | 1 | 0.916 | 1 | 0.689 | ||
Female | 1.01 | 0.77–1.33 | 0.93 | 0.68–1.28 | |||
Mother’s Education | Illiterate/Elementary | 1 | Test-for- trend: 0.008 | 0.803b | 0.56–1.15 | 0.154 | |
Preparatory/Secondary | 0.77 | 0.40–1.48 | |||||
Diploma/BA/Postgrad | 0.54 | 0.27–1.05 | |||||
Province | West Bank | 1 | 0.914 | 1 | 0.183 | ||
Gaza Strip | 0.99 | 0.75–1.29 | 1.34 | 0.78–2.31 | |||
Type of Community | City | 1 | 0.058 | 1 | 0.126 | ||
Village | 0.82 | 0.59–1.13 | 0.76 | 0.48–1.20 | |||
Camp | 0.74 | 0.53–1.04 | 1.01 | 0.51–1.99 | |||
Bedouin camp | 5.54 | 0.73–42.1 | 4.74 | 2.21–10.2 | |||
Has the child ever been breastfed? | Yes | 1 | 0.283 | 1 | 0.224 | ||
No | 0.65 | 0.30–1.43 | 0.56 | 0.25–1.22 | |||
Child received feeding at < 6 months of age? | Yes | 1 | 0.133 | 1 | 0.015 | ||
No | 1.24 | 0.94–1.63 | 1.53 | 1.18–1.98 | |||
Is the child currently taking the drops? | Yes | 1 | 0.745 | 1 | 0.854 | ||
No | 0.93 | 0.59–1.47 | 0.95 | 0.58–1.55 | |||
How long has the child taken the drops? (months) | Continuous Variable | 1.03 | 0.99–1.06 | 0.142 | 1.03 | 0.99–1.07 | 0.167 |
Where does the child receive the drops? | MOH | 1 | 0.444 | 1 | 0.126 | ||
UNWRA | 0.83 | 0.60–1.14 | 0.59 | 0.30–1.18 | |||
NGOs | 0.98 | 0.31–3.15 | 0.58 | 0.09–3.61 | |||
Private | 1.19 | 0.74–1.92 | 1.00 | 0.54–1.85 | |||
Medical Missions | N/A | N/A | |||||
CRP (mg/L) | Continuous Variable | 1.02 | 1.00–1.04 | 0.001 | 1.02 | 1.00–1.03 | 0.016 |
Anaemia | Yes | 1.47 | 1.04–2.08 | 0.027 | 1.50 | 1.08–2.10 | 0.047 |
No | 1 | 1 |
aAdjusted odds ratios adjusting for all other factors in the table. Likelihood Ratio Tests provided p-values
bMother’s education was treated as a continuous variable as the variable was found to be statistically significant in a test for trend in the bivariable analyses
cp-value from chi-squared test unless otherwise stated