Table 5.
Dependent variable | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Post-discharge outpatient addiction treatment (Mediator) | Mutual help (Mediator) | Abstinence (Outcome) | Indirect effect | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
b (95% CI) | p | b (95% CI) | p | b (95% CI) | p | b (95% CI) | p | |
|
||||||||
Independent variable | Concurrent associations - b (95% CI) | |||||||
| ||||||||
A-CHESS (study arm) | 0.11 (0.04–0.20) | 0.002 | 0.07 (−0.01–0.15) | 0.101 | 0.64 (0.20–1.26) | 0.043 | -- | -- |
Post-discharge outpatient addiction treatment | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.81 (−0.18–1.80) | 0.108 | 0.09 (−0.04–0.21) | 0.168 |
Post-discharge mutual help | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1.93 (1.02–2.85) | <0.001 | 0.13 (−0.04–0.31) | 0.135 |
| ||||||||
Lagged associations - b (95% CI) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
A-CHESS (study arm) | 0.10 (0.02–0.18) | 0.018 | 0.08 (−0.01–1.71) | 0.064 | 0.85 (0.09–1.60) | 0.027 | -- | -- |
Post-discharge outpatient addiction treatment | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.79 (−0.34-−1.92) | 0.169 | 0.06 (−0.05–1.69) | 0.287 |
Post-discharge mutual help | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1.87 (0.83–2.92) | <0.001 | 0.16 (−0.04–0.35) | 0.120 |
Coefficients are displayed from Mplus models computed with the maximum likelihood robust estimator. Linear regression coefficients are shown for post-discharge outpatient addiction treatment and mutual help (the dependent variable was the person-level mean of service use across follow-up periods) and probit regression coefficients are displayed for abstinence. Bolded values are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Models controlled for treatment site, interview month, age, gender, race, presence of mental health problems, prior addiction treatment, reasons for entering treatment, and within-person changes in service utilization. Race was dichotomized to white vs. other (collapsing black and other categories) due to empty bivariate cells. Within-person estimates for the associations between services utilization and abstinence are provided in Appendix E.