Table 4. QTL detected in the female (TGdL) and male (MB) mapping population for time of leaf budburst (lb).
LG | QTL | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
GW | cM | LOCUS | LOD | PV | Additive | GW | cM | LOCUS | LOD | PV | Additive | ||
01 | lb_TGdL_01 (A) | 3.3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3.1 | 20.8 | Corav1231 | 6.5 | 6.3 | -0.54 |
01 | lb_TGdL_01 (B) | 81.8 | 00364_36890 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 0.72 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
02 | lb_TGdL_02 | 19.2 | AJ417975b | 23.7 | 31.4 | -1.72 | 19.2 | AJ417975b | 32.6 | 43.2 | -1.43 | ||
08 | lb_TGdL_08 | 57.1 | 03460_19364 | 4.1 | 4.4 | -0.65 | 54.6 | 00542_41715 | 4.5 | 4.3 | -0.45 | ||
10a | lb_TGdL_10a | 17.1 | 00361_58830 | 4.1 | 4.4 | -0.65 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
11 | lb_TGdL_11 | - | - | - | - | - | 51.4 | 07109_9866 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 0.43 | ||
02 | lb_MB_02 (A) | 3.1 | - | - | - | - | - | 3.1 | 44.5 | 01881_28048 | 4.0 | 7.7 | 0.59 |
02 | lb_MB_02 (B) | 82.1 | 08587_2729 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 0.80 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
04 | lb_MB_04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
07 | lb_MB_07 | 64.5 | 00002_249778 | 3.3 | 6.3 | 0.76 | 57.1 | 04949_1954 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 0.53 | ||
LG | QTL | 2014 | 2015 | ||||||||||
GW | cM | LOCUS | LOD | PV | Additive | GW | cM | LOCUS | LOD | PV | Additive | ||
01 | lb_TGdL_01 (A) | 3.1 | 29.1 | 02104_20297 | 3.6 | 3.2 | -0.46 | 3.0 | 20.8 | Corav1231 | 5.8 | 6.0 | -0.65 |
01 | lb_TGdL_01 (B) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
02 | lb_TGdL_02 | 19.2 | AJ417975b | 35.9 | 46.3 | -1.74 | 19.2 | AJ417975b | 25.5 | 33.2 | -1.53 | ||
08 | lb_TGdL_08 | 57.1 | 03460_19364 | 4.7 | 4.2 | -0.53 | 54.4 | 10607_3880 | 3.9 | 4.0 | -0.53 | ||
10a | lb_TGdL_10a | - | - | - | - | - | 22.1 | 00502_20042 | 4.6 | 4.7 | -0.58 | ||
11 | lb_TGdL_11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
02 | lb_MB_02 (A) | 3.2 | 44.5 | 01881_28048 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 0.51 | 3.0 | 44.5 | 01881_28048 | 3.3 | 6.4 | 0.67 |
02 | lb_MB_02 (B) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
04 | lb_MB_04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
07 | lb_MB_07 | 57.1 | 04949_1954 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 0.48 | 58.0 | 21507_1735 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 0.65 | ||
LG | QTL | 2016 | |||||||||||
GW | cM | LOCUS | LOD | PV | Additive | ||||||||
01 | lb_TGdL_01 (A) | 3.2 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
01 | lb_TGdL_01 (B) | 79.5 | KG857 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 0.59 | |||||||
02 | lb_TGdL_02 | 19.2 | AJ417975b | 45.3 | 54.6 | -2.10 | |||||||
08 | lb_TGdL_08 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
10a | lb_TGdL_10a | 22.1 | 00502_20042 | 8.2 | 6.4 | -0.72 | |||||||
11 | lb_TGdL_11 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
02 | lb_MB_02 (A) | 3.1 | 44.7 | 17921_4014 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 0.57 | ||||||
02 | lb_MB_02 (B) | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
04 | lb_MB_04 | 17.3 | 04654_12942 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 0.64 | |||||||
07 | lb_MB_07 | 57.1 | 04949_1954 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 0.74 |
Each QTL name is given by the abbreviated acronym of the trait followed by the LG number. The table indicates genome-wide LOD Thresholds (GW) as determined by a permutation test at p ≤ 0.05, the closest linked marker (Locus) and their map position in cM, the estimated LODs at the QTL peak (LOD), the proportions (%) of the total phenotypic variance (PV) explained and the parental allelic contribution (Additive).