Table 2. Correlations between the density of CD8+tTILsIM and the clinicopathological factors.
Exploratory Group CD8+tTILsIM |
Validation Group CD8+tTILsIM |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | p-value | Low | High | p-value | |
Gender | ||||||
Male | 33 | 39 | 23 | 66 | ||
Female | 36 | 31 | 0.398 | 13 | 72 | 0.095 |
Age (years) | ||||||
<65 | 35 | 30 | 14 | 47 | ||
≥65 | 34 | 40 | 0.397 | 22 | 91 | 0.695 |
Tumor depth* | ||||||
T1-3 | 41 | 51 | 26 | 91 | ||
T4 | 28 | 19 | 0.109 | 10 | 47 | 0.553 |
Tumor diameter (cm) | ||||||
<5 | 33 | 32 | 21 | 80 | ||
≥5 | 36 | 38 | 0.866 | 15 | 58 | 1.000 |
Tumor location | ||||||
Right side | 19 | 14 | 11 | 47 | ||
Left side | 50 | 56 | 0.325 | 25 | 91 | 0.843 |
Histological type | ||||||
Well, Moderate | 64 | 63 | 32 | 130 | ||
Poorly, Mucinous | 5 | 7 | 0.764 | 4 | 8 | 0.274 |
Lymphatic involvement | ||||||
Negative | 12 | 18 | 9 | 45 | ||
Positive | 57 | 52 | 0.303 | 27 | 93 | 0.425 |
Venous involvement | ||||||
Negative | 53 | 60 | 25 | 109 | ||
Positive | 16 | 10 | 0.198 | 11 | 29 | 0.267 |
Lymph node metastasis | ||||||
Negative | 29 | 43 | 19 | 77 | ||
Positive | 40 | 27 | 0.028 | 17 | 61 | 0.851 |
CEA (ng/ml) | ||||||
<5 | 39 | 48 | 22 | 80 | ||
≥5 | 30 | 22 | 0.163 | 14 | 56 | 0.851 |
CA19-9 (U/ml) | ||||||
<37 | 58 | 65 | 32 | 123 | ||
≥37 | 8 | 5 | 0.389 | 3 | 12 | 1.000 |
*: According to UICC.TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (seventh edition).
CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9.