Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;9(20):15180–15197. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24612

Table 2. Correlations between the density of CD8+tTILsIM and the clinicopathological factors.

Exploratory Group
CD8+tTILsIM
Validation Group
CD8+tTILsIM
Low High p-value Low High p-value
Gender
 Male 33 39 23 66
 Female 36 31 0.398 13 72 0.095
Age (years)
 <65 35 30 14 47
 ≥65 34 40 0.397 22 91 0.695
Tumor depth*
 T1-3 41 51 26 91
 T4 28 19 0.109 10 47 0.553
Tumor diameter (cm)
 <5 33 32 21 80
 ≥5 36 38 0.866 15 58 1.000
Tumor location
 Right side 19 14 11 47
 Left side 50 56 0.325 25 91 0.843
Histological type
 Well, Moderate 64 63 32 130
 Poorly, Mucinous 5 7 0.764 4 8 0.274
Lymphatic involvement
 Negative 12 18 9 45
 Positive 57 52 0.303 27 93 0.425
Venous involvement
 Negative 53 60 25 109
 Positive 16 10 0.198 11 29 0.267
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative 29 43 19 77
 Positive 40 27 0.028 17 61 0.851
CEA (ng/ml)
 <5 39 48 22 80
 ≥5 30 22 0.163 14 56 0.851
CA19-9 (U/ml)
 <37 58 65 32 123
 ≥37 8 5 0.389 3 12 1.000

*: According to UICC.TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (seventh edition).

CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9.