Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;190(13):E380–E388. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170432

Table 2:

Diagnostic accuracy of the modified Allen test and the heart rate–monitoring application for assessing potential primary access sites

Parameter No. (%) of participants, modified Allen test
n = 219
No. (%) of participants, heart rate–monitoring application
n = 219
p value§
Positive test result* 38 (17.4) 18 (8.2) 0.008
Overall diagnostic accuracy, % (95% CI) 81.7 (76.0 to 86.6) 91.8 (87.3 to 95.1) 0.002
Specificity, % (95% CI) 82.8 (77.1 to 87.6) 93.0 (88.7 to 96.0) 0.001
Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 25.0 (0.6 to 80.6) 50.0 (11.8 to 88.2) 0.6
Negative predictive value, % (95% CI) 98.3 (95.2 to 99.7) 98.5 (95.7 to 99.7) 1.0
Positive predictive value, % (95% CI) 2.6 (0.7v13.8) 16.7 (3.6 to 41.4) 0.09
Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI) 1.5 (−1.1 to 4.0) 7.1 (0.4 to 13.8)
Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI) 0.9 (0.4 to 1.4) 0.5 (0.1 to 1.0)
Barbeau classification
 Class A 123 (56.2) 111 (50.7) 0.3
 Class B 79 (36.1) 93 (42.5) 0.2
 Class C 16 (7.3) 13 (5.9) 0.5
 Class D 1 (0.5) 2 (0.9) 0.6

Note: CI = confidence interval.

*

A positive result indicates that there is inadequate collateral blood flow; this includes all true-positive and false-positive results.

Barbeau classification was based on conventional plethysmography results: class A, no damping of pulse tracing immediately after radial artery compression; class B, damping of pulse tracing; class C, loss of pulse tracing followed by recovery of pulse tracing within 2 minutes; class D, loss of pulse tracing without recovery within 2 minutes.

Unless specified otherwise.

§

Values of p were generated using the Fisher exact test for between-arm comparisons.