Table 1.
Response Item | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Coordination rating | 3.27 | .68 | - | |||||||
2. Colocation rating | 3.67 | .64 | .56*** | - | ||||||
3. Integration rating | 2.95 | .87 | .72*** | .52*** | - | |||||
4. H&B codes | 2.23 | 1.13 | .46*** | .26 | .45*** | - | ||||
5. CPT codes | 3.54 | 1.00 | .01 | −.10 | −.10 | .08 | - | |||
6. Consultation codes | 1.56 | .85 | −.08 | −.03 | .27 | .34** | .21 | - | ||
7. Other codes | 1.35 | .93 | .08 | .12 | .08 | .28 | −.00 | .00 | - | |
8. % of consultations reimbursed | 26.00 | 33.60 | .09 | .18 | .18 | .31 | .10 | .39** | .17 | - |
Note. Ratings were made on a 4-point Likert scale except for #8, which allowed for free entry of an integer between 0–100; H&B= Health and Behavior; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology;
p ≤ .05;
p ≤ .01;
p ≤ .001.