Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Syst Health. 2017 Nov 27;36(1):108–112. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000306

Table 1.

Means, standard deviations, and correlations of integration dimension ratings, billing practices, and reimbursement for consultation.

Response Item M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Coordination rating 3.27 .68 -
2. Colocation rating 3.67 .64 .56*** -
3. Integration rating 2.95 .87 .72*** .52*** -
4. H&B codes 2.23 1.13 .46*** .26 .45*** -
5. CPT codes 3.54 1.00 .01 −.10 −.10 .08 -
6. Consultation codes 1.56 .85 −.08 −.03 .27 .34** .21 -
7. Other codes 1.35 .93 .08 .12 .08 .28 −.00 .00 -
8. % of consultations reimbursed 26.00 33.60 .09 .18 .18 .31 .10 .39** .17 -

Note. Ratings were made on a 4-point Likert scale except for #8, which allowed for free entry of an integer between 0–100; H&B= Health and Behavior; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology;

*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01;

***

p ≤ .001.