Table 1.
Authors, Year Reference No | Study design Level of Evidence | AO Classification Level of fracture Neurological deficit Number Segment stabilized | Sample size | Assessment | Follow-up months ±SD (range) | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cawley et al. 2014 [63] | non-randomized prospective comparative LoE III | A3 L1-L5 no bi- or multisegmental | 12 | Needle EMG USI LM CSA | minimum 6 MIS: 25±12 CO: 12±5 | more pronounced denervation in CO vs. MIS significant at adjacent levels |
Grass et al. 2006 [66] | non-randomized prospective controlled clinical trial LoE IIa | A2/A3/B1/B2 T12-L4 no information mono- or bisegmental | 57 | Needle EMG | 8.3 (4-18) | polyphasic potentials = drop-out of numerous motor units MIS < 20% vs. CO > 80% |
Wild et al. 2007 [9] | non-randomized retrospective case control study LoE III | A1/A2/A3 T12-L2 no no information | 21 | Hannover Spine Score SF-36 | 67.9±8 (54-85) | MIS better Outcome CO in all dimensions but no significant differences |
Ntilikina et al. 2017 [16] | non-random. retrospective comparative LoE III | A2/A3/B1/B2 T7-L5 no no information | 92 | MRI: CSA & signal intensity | 12 | Significant bigger CSA in the MIS group compared to CO |
SD= standard deviation, MIS minimally invasive stabilization, CO conventionally open, USI= Ultrasound Imaging, EMG= Electromyography, LM= lumbar multifidus muscle, CSA= cross sectional area, SF-36= Short Form Health survey, LoE= Level of Evidence.