Table 3.
Reason for TOBC use (n = 88)1 | |
Balloon-assisted coiling | 73.9% (65/88) |
Test occlusion | 5.7% (5/88) |
Safety precaution | 9.1% (8/88) |
Other | 11.4% (10/88) |
Vasospasm | 60.0% (6/10) |
Angioplasty | 10.0% (1/10) |
Balloon test occlusion of left cervical ICA | 10.0% (1/10) |
Flow diverter (pipeline)-assisted coiling | 10.0% (1/10) |
Postdilatation of a flow diverter | 10.0% (1/10) |
Balloon type/size used | |
Compliant/3.0 × 10.0 mm | 6.0% (5/83) |
Compliant/4.0 × 10.0 mm | 31.3% (26/83) |
Compliant/4.0 × 15.0 mm | 7.2% (6/83) |
Compliant/4.0 × 20.0 mm | 1.2% (1/83) |
Compliant/5.0 × 15.0 mm | 2.4% (2/83) |
Compliant/5.0 × 20.0 mm | 4.8% (4/83) |
Super Compliant/3.0 × 5.0 mm | 14.5% (12/83) |
Super Compliant/4.0 × 10.0 mm | 10.8% (9/83) |
Super Compliant/4.0 × 7.0 mm | 16.9% (14/83) |
Super Compliant/7.0 × 7.0 mm | 4.8% (4/83) |
Total number of subjects treated: n = 81; total number of TOBCs used: n = 83; total number of TOBC applications/treatments: n = 86. In 3 subjects, 1 TOBC was used to administer treatment at each of 2 treatment locations, and in 1 subject 2 TOBCs were used to administer treatment at 2 different treatment locations (with 1 TOBC being used per location). In 1 subject, 2 TOBCs were used to administer treatment at a single treatment location, as one TOBC malfunctioned and a second (replacement) TOBC had to be used to complete the procedure. TOBC, TransForm™ Occlusion Balloon Catheter; ICA, internal carotid artery.
For one subject, there were 2 reasons for the treatment provided (balloon-assisted coiling and as a safety precaution); likewise, for another subject there were 2 reasons for the treatment provided (balloon-assisted coiling and test occlusion).