Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 15;7(1-2):53–64. doi: 10.1159/000481518

Table 3.

Reasons for TOBC use and their types

Reason for TOBC use (n = 88)1
Balloon-assisted coiling 73.9% (65/88)
Test occlusion 5.7% (5/88)
Safety precaution 9.1% (8/88)
Other 11.4% (10/88)
 Vasospasm 60.0% (6/10)
 Angioplasty 10.0% (1/10)
 Balloon test occlusion of left cervical ICA 10.0% (1/10)
 Flow diverter (pipeline)-assisted coiling 10.0% (1/10)
 Postdilatation of a flow diverter 10.0% (1/10)

Balloon type/size used
Compliant/3.0 × 10.0 mm 6.0% (5/83)
Compliant/4.0 × 10.0 mm 31.3% (26/83)
Compliant/4.0 × 15.0 mm 7.2% (6/83)
Compliant/4.0 × 20.0 mm 1.2% (1/83)
Compliant/5.0 × 15.0 mm 2.4% (2/83)
Compliant/5.0 × 20.0 mm 4.8% (4/83)
Super Compliant/3.0 × 5.0 mm 14.5% (12/83)
Super Compliant/4.0 × 10.0 mm 10.8% (9/83)
Super Compliant/4.0 × 7.0 mm 16.9% (14/83)
Super Compliant/7.0 × 7.0 mm 4.8% (4/83)

Total number of subjects treated: n = 81; total number of TOBCs used: n = 83; total number of TOBC applications/treatments: n = 86. In 3 subjects, 1 TOBC was used to administer treatment at each of 2 treatment locations, and in 1 subject 2 TOBCs were used to administer treatment at 2 different treatment locations (with 1 TOBC being used per location). In 1 subject, 2 TOBCs were used to administer treatment at a single treatment location, as one TOBC malfunctioned and a second (replacement) TOBC had to be used to complete the procedure. TOBC, TransForm™ Occlusion Balloon Catheter; ICA, internal carotid artery.

1

For one subject, there were 2 reasons for the treatment provided (balloon-assisted coiling and as a safety precaution); likewise, for another subject there were 2 reasons for the treatment provided (balloon-assisted coiling and test occlusion).