Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 23;2(1):28–36. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12048

Table 1.

Lymph node counts in respective regional stations in the present study using SME compared with data from the Dutch trial

Present series (SME) Dutch trial (Bunt et al36 n = 8)
Station n Median (IQR) Mean (range)
1 141 4 (2‐6) 5.5 (3‐7)
2a 40 2 (0‐4) 2.9 (0‐10)
3 141 8.5 (4‐14) 12.0 (3‐36)
4saa 40 2 (0‐4) 12.6 (6‐21)c
4sb 141 2 (0‐7)
4d 141 8 (4‐11)
5 141 1 (0‐1) 1.0 (0‐4)
6 141 9 (5‐14) 6.0 (5‐7)
7 141 3 (1‐5) 4.0 (0‐8)
8 141 4 (2‐5) 4.0 (2‐7)
9 141 4 (2‐4) 5.3 (3‐9)
10b 125 5 (1‐6) 2.5 (0‐6)
11p 141 3 (1‐5) 5.7 (0‐21)d
11da 40 2 (0‐4)
12 141 1 (0‐1) No data
Sum 58.5 59.8
a

Removed in TG (n = 40).

b

Removed in TG + splenectomy or splenopancreatectomy (n = 24).

c

Expressed as the total number of lymph nodes at the no. 4 station.

d

Expressed as the total number of lymph nodes at the no. 11 station.

IQR, interquartile range; SME, systematic mesogastric excision; TG, total gastrectomy.