Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):260–269. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170287

Table 2.

Negative Binomial Regression Predicting the Number of Practice Sites per Physician

Estimate SE 95% LCLM 95% UCLM P Value
Intercept 1.1833 0.0159 1.1521 1.2144 <.0001
Age (years)
  <40 0.2884 0.0205 0.2482 0.3287 <.0001
  40–49 0.2704 0.0181 0.235 0.3058 <.0001
  50–59 0.1591 0.0189 0.122 0.1962 <.0001
  ≥60 Reference
Sex
  Male Reference
  Female −0.1544 0.0139 −0.1816 −0.1273 <.0001
IMG status
  IMG 0.0268 0.015 −0.0026 0.0562 .0735
  Non-IMG Reference
Present employment setting
  Self-employed solo practice −0.4138 0.0225 −0.4579 −0.3696 <.0001
  Two-physician practice −0.32 0.0394 −0.3973 −0.2427 <.0001
  Group practice Reference
  Medical school −0.0603 0.0457 −0.1499 0.0293 .1873
  State/local −0.0749 0.0196 −0.1132 −0.0366 .0001
  Federal −0.1233 0.081 −0.2819 0.0354 .1279
  Others −0.0662 0.0162 −0.0979 −0.0345 <.0001
Primary Specialty
  Non–primary care Reference
  Primary care −0.2781 0.0138 −0.3052 −0.2511 <.0001
Dispersion 0.409 0.0066 0.3963 0.4221

A total of 19,451 cases were used; 665 cases were excluded because of missing values.

IMG, international medical graduate; LCLM, Lower Confidence Limit; SE, standard error; UCLM, Upper Confidence Limit.