Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2017 Jan 12;17(4):684–699. doi: 10.1037/emo0000268

Table 3.

Parameter Estimates for Nested Taxonomy of Second-Order Coupled Oscillator Models

Group-Level Dynamics
(Mod el 1)		 Between-Person Predictors
(Model 2)		 Adjusted
p-value
Parameters Estimates (SE) 95%CI Estimates (SE) 95%CI
ηPR −0.146* (0.003) [−0.153, −0.140] −0.142* (0.003) [−0.148, −0.135] .001
ηEP −0.256* (0.005) [−0.265, −0.246] −0.246* (0.005) [−0.256, −0.237] .001
γ1,PR 0.005 (0.004) [−0.002, 0.012] 0.005 (0.004) [−0.002, 0.012] .332
γ1,EP −0.074* (0.004) [−0.083, −0.066] −0.077* (0.004) [−0.086, −0.069] .001
γ2,PR 0.066* (0.003) [−0.092, −0.079] 0.063* (0.003) [0.057, 0.068] .001
γ2,EP −0.112* (0.004) [0.121, 0.104] −0.098* (0.004) [−0.106, −0.090] .001
Intercept (γ3,PR0) 0.033 (0.026) [−0.017, 0.084] 0.026 (0.026) [−0.026, 0.078] .537
  36m MS (γ3,PR1) −0.005 (0.004) [−0.014, 0.003] .434
  30m EC (γ3,PR2) 0.045 (0.052) [−0.058, 0.147] .605
  30m NA (γ3,PR3) 0.113* (0.057) [0.002, 0.224] .108
  36mEXT(γ3,PR4) −0.002 (0.004) [−0.009, 0.007] .895
Intercept (γ3,EP0) −0.003 (0.019) [−0.040, 0.034] 0.003 (0.019) [−0.040, 0.034] .905
  36m MS (γ3,EP1) 0.001 (0.004) [−0.005, 0.007] .895
  30m EC (γ3,EP2) −0.026 (0.037) [−0.098, 0.047] .700
  30m NA (γ3,EP3) 0.013 (0.041) [−0.067, 0.092] .895
  36mEXT(γ3,EP4) −0.007* (0.003) [−0.012, −0.002] .033
Baseline PR(bPR0) 1.373* (0.091) [1.194, 1.552] 1.409* (0.094) [1.201, 1.574] .001
  36m MS (bPR1) 0.016 (0.015) [−0.013, 0.046] .495
  30m EC (bPR2) −0.031 (0.184) [−0.393, 0.330] .905
  30m NA (bPR3) −0.027 (0.198) [−0.415, 0.360] .905
  36m EXT (bPR4) 0.002 (0.013) [−0.024, 0.027] .905
Baseline EP(bEP0) 6.260* (0.239) [5.791, 6.729] 6.189* (0.217) [5.718, 6.573] .001
  36m MS (bEP1) −0.194* (0.036) [−0.264, −0.124] .001
  30m EC (bEP2) 0.925* (0.430) [0.082, 1.767] .081
  30m NA (bEP3) 0.761 (0.461) [−0.143, 1.664] .215
  36m EXT (bEP4) −0.009 (0.031) [−0.069, 0.050] .905
  σφbPR 0.958* — [0.852, 1.078] 0.956* — [0.922, .989] —
  σφbEP 2.561* — [2.269, 2.891] 2.248* — [1.987, 2.554] —
  r(φbPRi, φbEPi) −.53* — [−.64, −.40] −.57* — [−.68, −.44] —
  σφγ3,PR 0.255* — [0.212, 0.308] 0.256* — [0.219, 0.299] —
  σφγ3,EP 0.172* — [0.144, 0.205] 0.168* — [0.141, 0.200] —
  r(φγ3,PRi, φγ3,EPi) −.01 — [−.12, .10] .03* — [.01 .06] —
  σεPR 0.746* — [0.735, 0.758] 0.771* — [0.758, 0.783] —
  σεEP 0.404* — [0.400, 0.409] 0.375* — [0.371, 0.379] —
  AIC 27639.97 22054.43
  BIC 27792.57 22340.47
  Log Likelihood −13801.98 −10993.21

Note. N= 115. PR = Prepotent Response; EP = Executive Process; MS = Maternal Structuring Frequency; EC = Effortful Control; NA = Negative Affectivity; EXT = Externalizing Behavior Problems. Models 1 and 2 allowed for bPRi, bEPi, γ3,PRi, and γ3,EPi random effects.

*

p < .05.