Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Med. 2018 Feb 17;15(4):591–600. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.017

Table 3.

Associations of gender confirmation, gender identity, and procedures aimed at changing secondary sex characteristics with low transgender congruence and body image scores

Variables of interest Total N N (%) within treatment category Unweighted analyses Weighted analyses
PRa 95% CIb PRa 95% CIb
Transgender congruence score below medianc

Gender confirmation category
 Definitive bottom surgery 149 33 (22%) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Partial bottom surgery 77 34 (44%) 2.11 1.38 3.23 2.15 1.37 3.37
 Top surgery 161 71 (44%) 2.06 1.39 3.05 2.10 1.39 3.17
 HT only 210 138 (66%) 3.03 2.14 4.30 3.22 2.25 4.61
 No treatment 27 23 (85%) 3.96 2.72 5.75 3.66 2.28 5.88
Gender identity
 Transfeminine 306 150 (49%) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Transmasculine 318 149 (47%) 0.95 0.77 1.15 1.03 0.83 1.28
Changes in secondary sex characteristics
 Yes 75 30 (40%) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 No 549 269 (49%) 0.88 0.68 1.12 0.87 0.68 1.13

Body image score below mediand

Gender confirmation category
 Definitive bottom surgery 150 49 (33%) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Partial bottom surgery 79 39 (49%) 1.42 1.01 2.01 1.58 1.10 2.26
 Top surgery 167 67 (40%) 1.19 0.85 1.65 1.25 0.88 1.78
 HT only 220 116 (53%) 1.59 1.20 2.10 1.72 1.27 2.32
 No treatment 28 17 (61%) 1.81 1.22 2.68 1.75 1.08 2.83
Gender identity
 Transfeminine 319 139 (44%) 1.00 (reference) (reference)
 Transmasculine 325 149 (46%) 1.09 0.88 1.36 1.11 0.88 1.39
Procedures to change secondary sex characteristics
 Yes 77 24 (31%) 1.00 (reference) (reference)
 No 567 264 (47%) 1.24 0.87 1.76 1.29 0.87 1.90
a

PR, prevalence ratio adjusted for age, race, study site, and all variables listed in the table.

b

CI, confidence interval

c

Model based on 624 observations

d

Model based on 644 observations