Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Med. 2018 Mar 2;15(4):502–509. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.021

Table A2.

Global Sensory Impairment and Total Sensory Burden: Odds Ratio (95% CI) of Sexual Motivation, Relationship Quality, and Types of Sexual Activity

Global Sensory Impairment Total Sensory Burden
Sexual Motivation
 Think about Sex .99 (.81–1.20) 1.00 (.95–1.05)
 Sex Important .97 (.78–1.19) 1.00 (.95–1.06)
Relationship Quality
 Relationship Physically Pleasurable 1.09 (.93–1.28) 1.01 (.96–1.06)
 Relationship Emotionally Satisfying 1.02 (.88–1.18) .99 (.95–1.04)
Sexual Activities Among Sexually Active
 Frequency of Sexa 1.24 (.96–1.61) 1.04 (.97–1.12)
 Frequency of Foreplayb 1.17(.86–1.59) 1.02 (.94–1.11)
 Frequency of Vaginal Sexb 1.25 (.97–1.62) 1.03 (.96–1.10)
 Frequency of Giving Oral Sexb 1.14 (.85–1.52) 1.03 (.94–1.12)
 Frequency of Receiving Oral Sexb 1.10 (.84–1.43) 1.02 (.94–1.11)

Note: Covariates include: age, race, gender, partnership status, relationship happiness, Charlson comorbidity index, depressive symptoms, and difficulties with activities of daily living

a

Sexually active respondents were asked how frequently they engaged in sexual activity (once a day or more, 3–6 times a week, once or twice a week, 2 to 3 times a month, once a month or less),

b

Sexually active respondents were asked how frequently they participated in foreplay, oral sex, and vaginal intercourse when they engaged in sexual activity (always, usually, sometimes, rarely, never)