Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2018 May;29(3):356–363. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000794

Table 2.

Representativeness: comparison of combined comorbidity score in those with high vs. low EHR continuity

Comorbidity score categories Low EHR-continuity N (%)a High EHR-continuity N (%)b Stand. Diff.c
−1 15453 (13) 3774 (18) 0.15
0 28637 (24) 5604 (27) 0.08
1 21677 (18) 3500 (17) 0.03
2 13971 (12) 2142 (11) 0.04
3 9546 (8) 1382 (7) 0.05
4 7017 (6) 964 (5) 0.05
5 5555 (5) 769 (4) 0.04
6 4918 (4) 657 (3) 0.05
7 3846 (3) 543 (3) 0.03
8 2967 (3) 407 (2) 0.03
9 2128 (2) 274 (1) 0.04
10 1457 (1) 186 (1) 0.03
11 1001 (1) 119 (1) 0.03
12 647 (1) 73 (0.4) 0.03
13 410 (0.3) 46 (0.2) 0.02
14 243 (0.2) 28 (0.1) 0.02
15 197 (0.2) 12 (0.1) 0.03
16 88 (0.1) 5 (0.02) 0.02
Total N/mean stand. diff. 119851 20497 0.04
a

The proportion of encounters captured by the electronic health record system<60%.

b

The proportion of encounters captured by the electronic health record system>=60%.

c

Stand diff= Standardized difference. Combined comorbidity score8 ranges between −2 to 26 with a higher score associated with higher mortality; cell size <5 were not presented here.