Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2018 Feb 17;80:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.010

Table 1.

Ontology evaluation criteria in Vrandečić [7]

Criteria Definition
Accuracy Does the asserted knowledge in the ontology agree with the expert’s knowledge, which is often measured in terms of precision and recall?
Completeness Is the domain of interest appropriately covered (i.e., coverage)?
Conciseness Does the ontology define irrelevant elements with regards to the domain to be covered or redundant representations of the semantics?
Consistency Does the ontology include or allow for contradictions, which is often measured as the number of terms with inconsistent meaning?
Computational efficiency How fast can the tools (e.g., reasoners) work with the ontology?
Adaptability How easy or difficult is it to use an ontology in different contexts? Adaptability often measures coupling (i.e., number of external classes referenced) and cohesion (i.e., modularity of the ontology).
Clarity How effective can the ontology communicate the intended meaning of the defined terms?