Table 4.
The analysis result of the 15 ontologies with documented evaluation
| Number of Ontologies (n=15) | Completeness | Overall Completeness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validation | 9 | 60.00% | 70.00% |
| Verification | 12 | 80.00% | |
| Ranking (D1) | 0 | 0.00% | 31.11% |
| Correctness (D2) | 7 | 46.67% | |
| Quality (D3) | 7 | 46.67% | |
| Lexical (BL1) | 1 | 6.67% | 20.00% |
| Taxonomic (BL2) | 3 | 20.00% | |
| Semantic relationships (BL3) | 2 | 13.33% | |
| Context (BL4) | 3 | 20.00% | |
| Syntactic (BL5) | 1 | 6.67% | |
| Structural, architecture, design (BL6) | 8 | 53.33% | |
| Gold standard (BA1) | 2 | 13.33% | 31.67% |
| Application based (BA2) | 7 | 46.67% | |
| Data driven (BA3) | 5 | 33.33% | |
| User-based (BA4) | 5 | 33.33% | |
| Evolution (T1) | 1 | 6.67% | 28.89% |
| Logic/Rule based (T2) | 5 | 33.33% | |
| Metric-based (T3) | 7 | 46.67% | |
| Application-based evaluation (O1) | 7 | 46.67% | 22.22% |
| Data source comparison (O2) | 5 | 33.33% | |
| Human assessment (O3) | 5 | 33.33% | |
| NLP-based evaluation (O4) | 2 | 13.33% | |
| Reality benchmark (O5) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Community certification (O6) | 1 | 6.67% |