Table 5.

Categorization of the ontology quality assurance methods based on ontology evaluation criteria

Criteria	Structure -based	Lexical- based	Semantic -based	Abstraction -Network- based	Big- data- based	Crowd- sourcing- based	Cross- validation	Hybrid	Corpus -based	Miscell aneous
Concept orientation (Clarity)	[50] [53] [54] [55]	[56–60]	[61–65]	[66–76]		[80–82]	[83] [84] [85] [86]	[89]		[1] [92] [93]
Consistency (Consistency)	[50–55]	[56–60]	[61–65]	[66–76]	[77–79]	[80–82]	[83] [84] [85] [86]	[87] [88] [89]		[1] [92] [93]
Non-redundancy (Conciseness)	[51] [52] [54] [55]		[61] [63]	[66–76]	[77–79]		[83] [84] [85] [86]	[87] [88] [89]		[1] [92] [93]
Soundness (Accuracy)	[50–55]	[56–60]	[61–65]	[66–76]	[77–79]	[80–82]	[83] [84] [85] [86]	[87] [88] [89]		[1] [92] [93]
Comprehensi ve coverage (Completenes s)	[51] [52] [55]		[64, 65]	[66–76]				[89]	[90] [91]	[92] [93]