Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 May;22(5):1652–1661. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1909-0

Table 3.

Adjusted Odds of HIV Status Disclosure to Male Partners by Specific Types of IPV Experienced in the Current Relationship

Imputed Models: Adjusted Odds of HIV Status Disclosure
aOR
(95% CI)
Case-Analysis Models: Adjusted Odds of HIV Status Disclosure
aOR
(95% CI)
IPV Experiences N=320 N=320 N=320 N=288 N=288 N=288
 Experienced any physical IPV in current relationship 0.32*
(0.11 – 0.95)
0.32+
(0.10 – 1.07)
 Experienced any emotional IPV in current relationship 0.64
(0.23 – 1.82)
0.99
(0.32 – 3.04)
 Experienced any sexual IPV in current relationship 0.50
(0.17 – 1.44)
0.43
(0.14 – 1.38)
Controls
 Age 0.88+
(0.78 – 1.02)
0.88+
(0.78 – 1.01)
0.88+
(0.77 – 1.01)
0.91
(0.79 – 1.05)
0.89
(0.78 – 1.03)
0.90
(0.78 – 1.04)
 Parity 1.18
(0.70 – 1.98)
1.23
(0.76 – 2.03)
1.25
(0.76 – 2.06)
1.09
(0.63 – 1.87)
1.18
(0.70 – 1.99)
1.16
(0.68 – 1.96)
 Completed primary education 0.66
(0.19 – 2.22)
0.74
(0.23 – 2.42)
0.75
(0.22 – 2.49)
0.66
(0.18 – 2.50)
0.78
(0.21 – 2.88)
0.74
(0.19 – 2.82)
 Diagnosed with HIV during most recent pregnancy 0.21*
(0.05 – 0.88)
0.18*
(0.04 – 0.72)
0.18*
(0.05 – 0.77)
0.22+
(0.04 – 1.11)
0.18
(0.04 – 0.90)
0.18*
(0.03 – 0.89)
 Standardized wealth index 1.42
(0.83 – 2.42)
1.42
(0.83 – 2.44)
1.48
(0.86 – 2.55)
1.31
(0.73 – 2.34)
1.30
(0.74 – 2.31)
1.38
(0.77 – 2.48)
 Length of relationship 1.12
(0.96 – 1.30)
1.11
(0.96 – 1.28)
1.10
(0.95 – 1.27)
1.12
(0.95 – 1.32)
1.10
(0.94 – 1.28)
1.09
(0.94 – 1.27)
 Male partner HIV status:
  HIV positive ref ref ref ref ref ref
  HIV negative 0.25
(0.02 – 2.55)
0.26
(0.02 – 2.62)
0.27
(0.03 – 2.71)
0.29
(0.02 – 3.43)
0.34
(0.03 – 3.92)
0.35
(0.03 – 4.09)
  Unknown 0.02***
(0.00 – 0.14)
0.02***
(0.00 – 0.13)
0.02***
(0.00 – 0.15)
0.02***
(0.00 – 0.19)
0.02***
(0.00 – 0.19)
0.03**
(0.00 – 0.23)

Level of statistical significance:

+

p<0.10

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001