Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 28;10:68. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00068

Table 2.

Change in primary outcome measure scores.

Subject ΔMMSE ΔFAB ΔDET ΔIDN ΔOCL ΔOBK ΔGDS ΔGHQ ΔQOL
Δconcept Δmental Δmotor Δinterfer. Δinhib. ctrl. Δenvir. auto.
WAITLIST CONTROLS
Sub3 −1 −2 0 0 −2 0 0 0 3 8 14 2 5 4 −5
Sub4 −3 −2 −1 0 0 0 −1 0 −4 −4 6 17 12 0 −12
Sub5 0 2 0 1 0 3 −2 0 0 2 4 16 −1 4 5
Sub7 2 4 0 0 3 1 0 0 6 8 −4 −6 0 0 0
SCRA INTERVENTION
Sub1 1 2 1 0 2 0 −1 0 4 −2 8 0 0 0 4
Sub2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 13 −1 1 3
Sub6 −1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 −5 −6 1 0 0 4 6
Sub8 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 −6 −6 −12 18 1 −1 −2
Sub9 −9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9 −2 5 −2 −2 0
Sub11 −1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 −9 −13 6 −13 −3 1 9

All values were calculated (Post-intervention—Pre-intervention). The sign for DET, IDN, and GHQ12 were reversed so that a negative number reflects worse performance. Therefore, all negative values in this table indicate a decline. FAB sub-score measures include concept (Δconcept), mental flexibility (Δmental), motor programming (Δmotor), interference (Δinterfer.), inhibitory control (Δinhib. ctrl.), and environmental autonomy (Δenvir. auto.).