Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;69(4):261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2017.07.003

Table 9.

Comparison between the Core Valve and SAPIEN XT valves.

Core valve no /% SAPIEN XT no/% P value
Procedural and immediate outcome
Procedural success 22/23 (95.7%) 17/17 (100%) 0.869
Second valve 1/23(4.3%) 0/17(0.0%) 0.866
Valve migration 0/23(0.0%) 0/17(0.0%) 1.0
Referral for urgent surgery 0/23(0.0%) 0/17(0.0%) 1.0
Procedural death 0/23(0.0%) 0/17(0.0%) 1.0
Stroke 1/23(4.3%) 0/17(0.0%) 0.866



Bleeding
Minor 3/23 (13.0%) 3/17 (17.6%) 0.964
Major 1/23 (4.3%) 2/17 (11.6%) 0.794
Life threatening 0/23 (0.0%) 0/17 (0.0%) 1.000



Vascular complications
Minor 2/23 (8.6%) 2/17 (11.6%) 0.825
Major 2/23 (8.6%) 1/17 (5.8%) 0.782



At 6 month outcome
Mortality (total) 2/23 (8.6%) 1/17 (5.8%) 0.782
Cardiac 1/23 (4.3%) 0/17 (0.0%) 0.866
Non cardiac 1/23 (4.3%) 1/17 (5.8%) 0.602
Stoke 1/23 (4.3%) 1/17 (5.8%) 0.602
MI 1/23 (4.3%) 0/17 (0.0%) 0.866
New onset AF 2/23 (8.6%) 2/17 (11.6%) 0.825
Permanent pacemaker 4/23 (17.2%) 1/17 (5.8%) 0.550



Paravalvular regurgitation
Non to trace (grade 0) 11/23 (47.85%) 10/17 (58.9%) 0.708
Mild (grade I) 11/23 (47.85%) 7/17 (41.1%) 0.918
Moderate (grade II) 1/23 (4.3%) 0/17 (0.0%) 0.866
Severe (grade III and IV) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1.000
Rehospitalization 1/23 (4.3%) 1/17 (5.8%) 0.602