Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;1(2):132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.003

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Pore size distribution of 2, 4 and 5% CS/CMC scaffolds and 5%CS/CMC scaffolds with 5, 10 and 20% MgG respectively. Pore size were determined by Image J software analysis of SEM images (n = 3 for each concentration). *p < 0.05 compared to 5% CS/CMC with no MgG (sample C on Table 1).