Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 25;9(1):63–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.010

Table 9.

Summary of the data from the recent studies on the use of Allograft Prosthesis Composite for the management of massive skeletal defects in distal femur.

Authors Diagnosis No of patients Mean age (years) Average Follow up Clinical outcome Radiological Outcome Complications Result Survival
Moon et al.107 Tumors 12 19 89 m MSTS score available for 6 patients; 8 patients had complications non-union, fracture, infection and stem perforation 3 non- union and 2 failures revised
Average = 90%
Mo S et al.108 Tumors 12 29.5 45.7 m MSTS in 9 patients with preserved limb = 27 1 fracture 1 died
1 infection 4 revisions
1 instability
1 local recurrence
Saidi K et al.109 Fractures 7 APC 79 KSS =  74.1 1 infection 3 revisions
9 RSA 1 dislocation
7 DFR 1 non-union
Ye ZM et al.110 Tumors 12 PF 64 m EFS = 23.4 No loosening No dislocation 3 died
10 DF
3 PT
Farfalli et al.111 Tumors (Group 1)
50 APC (28 DF, 22 PT) with non-constrained prosthesi
35 in both Group 1–69 m MSTS = 25 in Group 1 Group 1: Group 1: Group 1: 69% at 5 years and 62% at 10 years
Group 2–75 m MSTS = 25.3 in Group 2 8 infection 2 died,
(Group 2)
36 APC (17 DF, 19 PT) with constrained prosthesis
3 fracture 16 APC removed Group 2: 80 % at 5 years and 53 % at 10 years
2 instability
1 loosening Group 2:
1 local recurrence 5 died,
1 non-union 9 APC removed
Group 2:
3 infection
3 fracture
3 loosening
Wilkins RM et al .112 Revision of distal femoral replacement in tumors 4 17 59 m MSTS = 62% No fracture No revision
No loosening
No infection

Abbreviations: m = months, y = years, APC = Allograft Prosthesis Composite, DF = Distal Femur, PT = Proximal Tibia, RSA = revision systems, DFR = Distal Femur Endoprostheis, KSS = Knee Society Score, MSTS = Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score.