Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 20;2018:4528148. doi: 10.1155/2018/4528148

Table 1.

Main clinical studies addressing Ssc in patients with or without PAH.

Imaging method Author (year) Number of patients Clinical setting Analyzed parameter SSc Controls p
Echocardiography Pigatto
et al. (2015) [35]
n = 88 SSc versus healthy subjects sPAP (mmHg) 33 ± 14.0 22 ± 5.0 <0.0001
TAPSE (mm) 23 ± 3.0 26 ± 2.0 <0.0001
PVR (WU) 1.9 ± 0.6 1.4 ± 0.3 0.001
global RVLS (%) −24.8 ± 4.0 −25.6 ± 3 n.s.
Mukherjee
et al. (2016) [58]
n = 178 SSc versus healthy subjects sPAP (mmHg) 31.4 ± 13.3 22.6 ± 4.4 0.0001
TAPSE (mm) 21.6 ± 4.7 22.5 ± 4.0 0.307
PVR (WU) 1.48 ± 0.45 1.24 ± 0.26 0.002
global RVLS (%) −17.7 ± 5.9 −20.4 ± 2.4 0.005
Durmus
et al. (2015) [36]
n = 80 SSc versus healthy subjects sPAP (mmHg) 24.2 ± 5.7 19.8 ± 6.2 0.002
TAPSE (mm) 21.1 ± 3.2 24.3 ± 3.4 <0.001
global RVLS (%) −18.5 ± 4.9 −21.8 ± 2.4 <0.001

cMRI Hachulla
et al. (2009) [69]
n = 52 SSc-PAH versus SSc without PAH RV hypertophy, n (%) 2 (17) 0 (0) 0.04
RV dilation, n (%) 4 (33) 7 (17) 0.25
Mean RV EF (%) 54 (13) 50 (11) 0.20
Mean RV EDV index (ml/mm2) 75 (9) 79 (23) 0.67
Delayed contrast enhancement, n (%) 1 (8) 10 (26) 0.42
Tzelepis
et al. (2007) [70]
n = 36 Abnormal versus normal 24-h ECG in SSc Delayed contrast enhancement, n (%) 15 (78.9) 9 (52.9) 0.098
Number of enhancing segments, n 5.4 ± 4.8 2.5 ± 2.9 0.035
Enhancement at RV insertion points, n (%) 4 (21.1) 2 (11.8) 0.66
Kelemen
et al. (2015) [46]
n = 53 SSc-PAH versus IPAH RV mass (g) 58.8 65.9 0.47
RV EDV index (ml/mm2) 88.1 90.1 0.83
RV EF (%) 46.0 41.6 0.29

Scintigraphy Papagoras et al. (2014) [65] n = 35 SSc patients Reversible myocardial perfusion defects, n of pts (%) 21 (60) - -

sPAP: systolic pulmonary artery pressure; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; RVLS: right ventricle longitudinal strain; EF: ejection fraction; EDV: end diastolic volume.