Table 1.
Total scores: 0–10: the software is evaluated as useless; 10–20: DEMOVA cannot replace goniometer measures; 20–30: DEMOVA is considered as a complementary tool for diagnosis and evaluation of a patient, alternative to goniometer; 30–45: DEMOVA is considered as a reliable tool for quantitative analysis of movement.
| Related to graphic interface of DEMOVA | |||||
|
| |||||
| (1) The software was simple to use? | Select one option: 1 = very difficult; 2 = difficult; 3 = normal; 4 = easy; 5 = very easy | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (2) Would you usually use it as a measurement tool? | Select one option: 1 = never; 2 = sometimes; 3 = oftentimes; 4 = usually; 5 = always | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (3) The information is clearly distributed in the screen? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = poor; 3 = normal; 4 = good; 5 = very good | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (4) Do you think that the soft is user friendly? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = a little; 3 = normal; 4 = friendly; 5 = very friendly | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| Related to information | |||||
|
| |||||
| (5) Analysis and display of movement paths of upper limb in the three planes is easy to understand? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = difficult; 3 = normal; 4 = simple; 5 = very simple | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (6) Do you think that trajectories graphic information is a useful tool to complete your diagnosis and clinical evaluation? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = a little; 3 = normal; 4 = useful; 5 = very useful | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (7) Do you think that you can replace goniometric measures with DEMOVA in the clinical evaluation? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = maybe; 3 = I will use both; 4 = I will use DEMOVA and in occasions the goniometer; 5 = replacement for DEMOVA | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (8) Do you consider the 3D graphic of (area) surface covered for upper limb useful for analysis purposes? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = a little; 3 = normal; 4 = useful; 5 = very useful | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
(9) Graphics of abduction-adductions of two patients are presented in this option. One of them has upper limb disturbances. Can you describe the information as relevant in the comparison? 
|
Please, explain your opinion | ||||
|
| |||||
| (10) Related to item (9): is the graphical information relevant for quantitative evaluation of the affected patient? | Select one option: 1 = no; 2 = a little; 3 = normal; 4 = useful; 5 = very useful | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| (11) Do you think that DEMOVA is a useful tool for diagnosis, quantitative evaluation, and long-term treatment for upper limb movements? | Please, explain your opinion | ||||