Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e019617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019617

Table 5.

Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for LGA by abnormal prepregnancy BMI and unrecommended gestational weight gain compared with normal-weight participants within IOM adherence guidelines among PPG (1978–1993) and CSL (2002–2008) cohorts

IOM adherence Prepregnancy BMI n Model I P values Model II P values
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
PPG
Within Normal/underweight 110 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Overweight/obese 8
Over Normal/underweight 83 1.61 (0.93 to 2.80) 0.09 1.48 (0.83 to 2.64) 0.18
Overweight/obese 58 2.04 (1.05 to 3.97) 0.03 2.12 (1.11 to 4.04) 0.02
CSL
Within Normal 56 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Overweight 15 0.38 (0.08 to 1.81) 0.23 0.53 (0.10 to 2.73) 0.45
Obese 23 1.86 (0.75 to 4.60) 0.18 1.99 (0.79 to 5.01) 0.15
Over Normal 82 2.14 (1.17 to 3.91) 0.01 1.83 (0.99 to 3.40) 0.06
Overweight 70 2.35 (1.26 to 4.40) 0.01 2.25 (1.18 to 4.28) 0.01
Obese 49 1.26 (0.61 to 2.59) 0.53 1.49 (0.70 to 3.19) 0.30

BMI was defined as: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2); normal (18.5 kg/m2≤BMI<25.0 kg/m2); overweight (25.0 kg/m2≤BMI<30.0 kg/m2); obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2).

Insufficient LGA infants of overweight/obese women who remained within IOM guidelines to make LGA OR determination.

Model I: adjusted for age.

Model II: adjusted for model I+maternal race, parity, pre-eclampsia.

BMI, body mass index; CSL, Consortium on Safe Labor; IOM, Institute of Medicine; LGA, large-for-gestational age; PPG, Diabetes in Pregnancy Program Project.