Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 28;38(13):3230–3239. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3082-17.2018

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical evaluation from the two participant groups

Variables PD ICB− PD ICB+ p
N 18 17
Sex, M/F 13/5 11/6 0.72
Age, years 62.7 ± 10.1 60.9 ± 6.6 0.17
Disease duration, years 6.1 ± 4.5 5.7 ± 3.2 0.99
CES-D 15.1 ± 7.2 16.3 ± 10.3 0.89
MDS-UPDRS Part II 23.2 ± 7.7 20.3 ± 7.7 0.19
QUIP-RS total 18.1 ± 11.9 36.5 ± 10.1 <0.0001*
ICB symptom distribution (based on semistructured behavioral interview)
    Hobbyism n/a 12/17
    Eating n/a 11/17
    Sex n/a 11/17
    Shopping n/a 4/17
    Gambling n/a 0/17
Laterality score (− = left worse, + = right worse) −3.1 ± 9.6 −1.8 ± 12.0 0.74
Dopamine replacement therapy
    Total LEDD, mg/d 693.9 ± 406.3 673.8 ± 440.0 0.69
    Agonist single-dose equivalent, mg/d 135.4 ± 76.4 103.9 ± 65.1 0.19

Data are shown as mean ± SD.

*Indicates uncorrected p < 0.05.

No significant group difference observed in the type of DAgonist prescribed (Table 1-3) or the fraction of LEDD accounted for by DAgonist as opposed to levodopa (p = 0.99; Table 1-1). PET acquisition parameters were similar (Table 1-2).

PD ICB+, PD with symptoms consistent with ICB; PD ICB−, PD without ICBs.