Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 21;176(4):2804–2818. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01577

Table I. Segregation distortion analysis of oft1 mutant and complemented lines.

Parents (♂ × ♀)a #Rb #Sb Total %R TEc χ2d P
oft1-1+/− self 258 247 505 51.1 1.04 38.5 <0.00001
oft1-2+/− self 51 57 108 47.2 0.89 11.1 0.0009
oft1-3+/− self 369 328 697 52.9 1.13 45.2 <0.00001
Col-0 × oft1-1+/− 57 52 109 52.3 1.10 0.11 0.74
oft1-1+/− × Col-0 0 116 116 0 0 58 <0.00001
Col-0 × oft1-3+/− 364 340 704 51.7 1.07 0.41 0.52
oft1-3+/− × Col-0 1 1,871 1,872 0.05 5.3 × 10−4 934 <0.00001
Col-0 × oft1-3−/−; 11p::OFT1-GFP+/−e 84 102 186 45.2 0.82 0.87 0.35
oft1-3−/−; 11p::OFT1-GFP+/− × oft1-3−/−e 494 0 494 0 ND 247 <0.00001
Col-0 × oft1-3+/−; 11p::OFT1-GFP+/−e 161 158 319 50.5 1.02 0.014 0.91
oft1-3+/−; 11p::OFT1-GFP+/− × Col-0e 771 1,688 2,459 31.4 0.46 171.0 <0.00001
a

The parent lines of each cross are indicated. Transgenic lines containing the 11p::OFT1-GFP construct are abbreviated as 11p::OFT1-GFP with the indicated genotype.

b

The total number of resistant (#R) and sensitive (#S) individuals in each cross F1 progeny are indicated. Transmission of alleles was scored as described in “Materials and Methods”: oft1-1 (kanamycin resistance), oft1-2 (PCR genotyping), oft1-3 (BASTA resistance), and 11p::OFT1-GFP (hygromycin resistance).

c

Transmission efficiency (TE) was calculated as #R/#S.  dχ2 was calculated based on the expectation of a 1:1 segregation of transgenes in the resulting F1 populations.  eThe aggregate numbers of F1 progeny from at least three independent complemented lines are represented.