Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;14(4):e7390. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167390

Figure 5. Cell‐to‐cell variability in signal transmission in cells with mutations affecting microtubule end function.

Figure 5

  • A–H
    η2(P) vs. P and dose response in: (A, B) kar3‐1 (SGA108, the “rigor mutant”), ∆kar3 (SGA2015), and WT cells (SGA103) (three replicates each); (C, D) ∆cik1 (GPY4123) and WT cells (GPY4000) (two replicates); (E, F) tub1‐828 expressing and WT cells (GPY1858) (four replicates); and (G, H) kar3‐15 (SGA109) and WT cells (SGA103) (three replicates). In (A, C, E, G), the x‐axis values are the transmitted signal P. In (B, D, F, H), the y‐axis values are P divided by the maximum value of P observed for the WT strain in each.

Source data are available online for this figure.