Table 5. Test of relationships between constructs.
| Hypotheses | Estimated values | Test results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Users' “subjective norm” for using the system has positive influence on “intention to use” | 0.00 (0.05) | Unsupported |
| H2 | Users' “subjective norm” for using the system has positive influence on “perceived usefulness” | –0.01 (–0.18) | Unsupported |
| H3 | Users' “subjective norm” for using the system has positive influence on “image” | 0.39 (5.43) | Supported |
| H4 | Users' “image” for using the system has positive influence on “perceived usefulness” | 0.02 (0.33) | Unsupported |
| H5 | Users' “perceived usefulness” of the system has positive influence on their “intention to use” the system | 0.35 (3.89) | Supported |
| H6 | “Job relevance” of the system has positive influence on users' “perceived usefulness” of the system | 0.37 (4.86) | Supported |
| H7 | “Output quality” of the system has positive influence on users' “perceived usefulness” of the system | 0.27 (3.42) | Supported |
| H8 | Users' “perceived ease of use” of the system has positive influence on their “perceived usefulness” of the system | 0.29 (3.35) | Supported |
| H9 | “Result demonstrability” of the system has positive influence on users' “perceived usefulness” of the system | –0.03 (–0.35) | Unsupported |
| H10 | Users' “perceived ease of use” of the system has positive influence on their “intention to use” the system | 0.21 (1.97) | Supported |
Note: The numerical figure is standardized parameter estimate, and the parenthesized value denotes the t -value.