Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Ecol Food Nutr. 2017 Dec 11;57(1):13–31. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2017.1406853

Table 4.

Factors Associated with Fast-Food Sources Use Frequency (≥ 1 Times/Week) among Low-Income African American Adults Living in Baltimore City (n = 295).

Unadjusted
Adjusted
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Healthy food beliefs and attitudes scale 0.96 [0.92, 1.01] 0.95* [0.90, 0.99]
  Affordability 0.99 [0.92, 1.08] 0.99 [0.90, 1.08]
  Convenience 0.93 [0.82, 1.04] 0.90 [0.79, 1.02]
  Importance 0.84* [0.74, 0.96] 0.79** [0.68, 0.91]
  Tastes good 1.02 [0.80,1.30] 0.98 [0.75, 1.28]
Food-related psychosocial factors scale
  Food and nutrition knowledge 0.97 [0.85, 1.11] 0.88 [0.75, 1.03]
  Intentions on healthy eating 0.95 [0.90, 1.01] 0.93* [0.88, 0.99]
  Healthy eating self-efficacy 0.93* [0.88, 0.99] 0.92* [0.86, 0.99]
Number of times getting food from:
  Farmers market 1.03 [0.80, 1.32] 0.93 [0.70, 1.23]
  Corner store 1.05** [1.02, 1.07] 1.06*** [1.02, 1.09]
  Sit-down restaurant 1.60*** [1.27, 1.98] 1.53** [1.20, 1.93]
  Specialty store 1.00 [0.94, 1.07] 0.98 [0.93, 1.05]
  Convenience store 1.06* [1.01, 1.11] 1.06* [1.01, 1.12]
  Supermarket or grocery store 1.06* [1.01, 1.11] 1.06 [0.99, 1.12]
Food acquisition score (yes/no)
  Healthy food acquisition 1.00 [0.95, 1.06] 1.00 [0.94, 1.07]
  Less-healthy food acquisition 1.13*** [1.06, 1.21] 1.17*** [1.09, 1.26]

Note. Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for employment status (unemployed), poverty status, education level (< high school degree), BMI (kg/m2), sex (female), age (years), participation in food assistance programs (SNAP and WIC). Fast-food sources = carryout and/or fast-food restaurants; BMI = body mass index; WIC = The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; SNAP = Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001 for differences between groups.