Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 31;22(1):51–57. doi: 10.5213/inj.1834982.491

Table 2.

Comparision of follow-up visit results between DM OAB group and idiopathic OAB group

Variable V2
V3
DM OAB idiopathic OAB DM OAB idiopathic OAB
OABSS Total 3.23 ± 1.2a) 3.16 ± 1.4a) 3.01 ± 0.9b) 2.89 ± 1.1b)
Urgency 3.71 ± 2.1a,c,d) 2.28 ± 1.7a) 2.09 ± 1.8b) 1.77 ± 0.9b)
Urinary urgency incontiennce 0.47 ± 0.2a,c,d) 0.32 ± 0.1a) 0.23 ± 0.1b) 0.27 ± 0.1b)
Frequency 7.01 ± 5.5a) 5.98 ± 3.4a) 6.33 ± 3.7b) 5.70 ± 2.3b)
Nocturia 1.36 ± 0.1a) 1.24 ± 0.4a) 1.15 ± 0.4b) 0.85 ± 0.3b)
Qmax (mL/sec) 15.26 ± 6.5 15.14 ± 6.4 13.86 ± 6.7 12.76 ± 6.3
PVR (mL) 27.43 ± 18.1 29.97 ± 19.4 32.74 ± 14.4 36.36 ± 17.3

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

DM, diabetes mellitus; OAB, overactive bladder; OABSS, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum flow rate; PVR, postvoid resirual urine; V1, first visit (visit 1); V2, week 4 (visit 2); V3, week 12 (visit 3).

a)

P<0.05, V1 vs. V2.

b)

P<0.05, V1 vs. V3.

c)

P<0.05, V2 vs. V3.

d)

P<0.05, DM OAB vs. idiopathic OAB.

The results of V1 is expressed in Table 1.