Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;4(5):e175230. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5230

Table 2. Multivariate Competing-Risks Regression Analyses of Factors Associated With Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy and Postoperative Radiotherapy.

Factor PS-Matched Patient Cohort,
SHR (95% CI)a
P Value
ART vs ESRT 0.34 (0.24-0.48) <.001
Age at surgery 1.00 (0.98-1.02) .65
Year of surgery 1.02 (0.99-1.05) .24
Pathological T stage
T2 1 [Reference]
T3a 1.14 (0.78-1.67) .51
T3b 1.87 (1.20-2.92) .005
Surgical Gleason score 2.06 (1.75-2.41) <.001
Surgical margin (±) 1.29 (0.82-2.04) .27
Omitting nodal RT 2.27 (1.33-3.87) .003
RT dose (Gy), prostate fossa 0.96 (0.91-1.01) .10
Postoperative ADT 0.30 (0.12-0.74) .009

Abbreviations: ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; ART, adjuvant radiation therapy; ESRT, early-salvage radiation therapy; PS, propensity score; RT, radiation therapy; SHR, subhazard ratio.

a

Subhazard ratios are reported for a 1-unit increase in the continuous variables.