Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018 Mar-Apr;15(2):537–550. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2015.2440244

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Illustration of sequential resolution sampling. (a) Initially, we utilize the standard MCMC algorithm to produce the posterior distribution of the selection indicators in Inline graphic at resolution 1, i.e. P1(· | S, X, y), which is then used to guide the construction of the proposal function in the SRS-MCMC algorithm to produce P2(· | S, X, y) for Inline graphic at resolution 2. This procedure is performed sequentially until resolution K to generate the posterior distribution PK(· | S, X, y) for our target model Inline graphic. (b) Decomposition of the proposal function T(· → · | •) (red) includes two steps for drawing a proposed sample. Step 1 (green): draw { c(k-1),γ(k-1)} from the posterior distribution Pk−1(· | ·) under the model Inline graphic at resolution k−1. Step 2 (blue): sample { c(k-1),γ(k-1)} given { c(k-1),γ(k-1)} in step 1 and the current state of the Markov chain using H(· | ·). (c) A binary tree represents the sampling scheme for cg,(k) based on the probability mass function h(· | ·). It is determined by cg,(k) and cg,o(k) for g′ satisfying bgg(k)=1, and cg,o(k).