. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018 Mar-Apr;15(2):537–550. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2015.2440244

TABLE 2.

Variable selection performance by three different algorithms in Simulation 1

	Threshold	SS	SRS (ν₂ = 0.9)	SRS (ν₂ = 1)	fastSRS
Sensitivity/Specificity	95%	0.659/0.984	0.600/0.978	0.625/0.982	0.671/0.985
	90%	0.847/0.941	0.729/0.934	0.753/0.936	0.847/0.941
	85%	0.941/0.889	0.941/0.888	0.953/0.895	0.965/0.895
	80%	0.977/0.838	1.000/0.842	1.000/0.846	1.000/0.844

AUC		0.973	0.966	0.970	0.979
Effective Time (mins)¹		13.100	1.710	1.600	2.600
Resolution related Time (mins)²		0.000	5.342	5.033	7.233
ESS/min		0.669	7.458	8.381	454.004

Computational time for resolution K (highest resolution) for the SRS and the fastSRS.

Computational time for resolutions 1, …, K − 1 for the SRS and the fastSRS.