Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):883–895. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0154

Table 2. Prostate Cancer–Specific and All-Cause Mortality in the Single Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing Intervention Group vs Standard Practice (Control).

Intervention Group (n = 189 386)a Control Group (n = 219 439)b Rate Difference/1000 Person-Years (95% CI) Rate Ratio (95% CI)c P Value Rate Ratio (95% CI)d P Value
No. of
Deaths
Rate/1000 Person-Years (95% CI) No. of
Deaths
Rate/1000 Person-Years (95% CI)
Primary Outcome: Prostate Cancer Mortalitye
Intention-to-screen cohort 549 0.30 (0.27 to 0.32) 647 0.31 (0.29 to 0.33) −0.013 (−0.047 to 0.022) 0.96 (0.85 to 1.08) .50 0.93 (0.67 to 1.29) .66
Secondary Outcome: All-Cause Mortality
Intention-to-screen cohort 25 459 13.74 (13.57 to 13.91) 28 306 13.51 (13.35 to 13.67) 0.229 (−0.001 to 0.460) 0.99 (0.94 to 1.03) .49 1.07 (0.93 to 1.23) .35
a

There were 1 853 167 person-years, calculated as the time until death or censoring.

b

There were 2 095 405 person-years, calculated as the time until death or censoring.

c

Likelihood ratio test of the null hypothesis (ie, no difference in prostate cancer mortality between the groups) adjusted for randomization cluster and age stratum.

d

Analysis to obtain the causal effect of screening among those attending the PSA testing clinic using a generalized method of moments estimator with random allocation as an instrumental variable.

e

Defined as definite, probable, or intervention-related prostate cancer death as determined by an independent cause of death committee.